What Is The Difference Between A Tank Destroyer And A Battle Tank?

To begin, we must clarify What Is The Difference Between A Tank Destroyer And A Battle Tank? Tanks are designed to combat any threat, but Tank Destroyers are, in essence, purpose-built devices with the primary objective of destroying opposing tanks.

Tanks were armored tracked vehicles with machine guns and moderately powerful main cannons that were designed to directly support infantry. The role of the Tank Destroyer, as well as the tactics employed by them, must be understood.

What Is The Difference Between A Tank Destroyer And A Battle Tank?

The tank destroyer is specifically made to take on enemy tanks and other armored fighting vehicles, even though tanks are meant for front-line warfare, combining operational mobility, tactical offensive, and defensive capabilities, and executing all major responsibilities of the armored troops.

Difference Between A Tank Destroyer And A Battle Tank

A tank destroyer, tank hunt, tank killer, or conscience anti-tank gun is an armored tank destroyer equipped with a direct-fire artillery cannon or a missile launcher and designed to engage and destroy enemy tanks with limited operational capabilities. Tanks are armored battle vehicles that integrate operational mobility with precise offensively and defensively capabilities.

Tanks execute all of the armored forces’ principal missions. On the other side, the tank destroyer is designed to battle enemy tanks and other armored fighting vehicles. Many are wheeled, while others are built on a tracked tank chassis. Armies have chosen multirole main battle tanks since World War II, while gun-armed powerful tank destroyers have fallen out of favor.

Anti-tank guided missile (ATGM) carriers with light armor are often utilized for additional long-range anti-tank work. The resurgence of inciting separatism in the first two years of the twenty century saw the emergence of gun-armed wheeled vehicles, also known as protected gun systems that resemble tank destroyers on the surface but are used as direct fire support units in low-intensity operations like the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Tank VS Tank Destroyer

Tank destroyers were created with the sole intent of eliminating enemy tanks. Their key distinguishing traits are the lack of turrets on the majority of them, as well as the fact that they are equipped with significantly larger and more powerful weaponry. One of the main reasons they don’t have a turret is because of the larger and heavier armament, which was eliminated during the design process.

This has the added benefit of lowering the vehicle’s profile and so boosting concealment. Tanks, on the other hand, are built to deal with every situation. This wasn’t always the case during WWII, but the Main Battle Tank (which indicated a tank capable of coping with all threats) idea became standard during the Cold War.

Due to quick technical advancements, this concept was able to be implemented, allowing for stronger armor and armament while yet maintaining reasonable mobility. It’s important to remember that the initial objective of tanks was not to battle enemy tanks – after all, there were no German tanks to fight when the British first deployed tanks in 1916.

 Tanks were armored gun platforms designed to be the mobile spearhead of an offensive, smashing through enemy defenses and allowing other soldiers, including lighter, faster-moving tanks, to follow through.

As a result, the capacity to demolish opposing infantry strengths, bunkers, machine-gun posts, and artillery emplacements were the most vital component of their job. Fighting opposing tanks was just supposed to be a side job.

Tanks are adaptable machines that can deal with any threat, whereas Tank Destroyers are rigid machines that specialize in destroying enemy tanks, making them far less capable of coping with other threats. There were cruisers with turrets, most famously the American tank destroyers, although they were the exception rather than the rule.

This came at the expense of being able to equip smaller weapons, the largest of which being a 90mm on the M36. Destroyers could also include AFVs that aren’t strictly “tank-like,” such as the American M3 GMC, which was essentially a truck with an anti-tank gun mounted on it.

It’s also worth noting that by the end of World War II, the Tank Destroyer concept had all but gone out. This is mostly owing to the advent of the universal tank concept, sometimes known as the Main Battle Tank.

Destroyer In World War II

As fighters developed effective armored vehicles and tactics throughout WWII, dedicated anti-tank vehicles made their first big appearance. Some of the designs were basic, such as mounting an anti-tank gun on a tracked vehicle to enable movement, while others were more complicated.

The Murder III and Jag panzer 38 vehicles, which were based on the same chassis but were considerably different, are an example of tank destroyer technological progress throughout the war:

The Murder was simply an anti-tank gun on tracks, whereas the Jag panzer 38 sacrificed some firepower (its Pak 39, designed to operate within the confines of a fully armored fighting compartment, fires the same projectiles from a lower propellant charge than the Murder’s Pak 40) in exchange for better armor protection and battlefield concealment.

Tank destroyers, with the exception of most American designs, were all turretless and had permanent or casemate superstructures. The absence of rotating cannon was less of an issue when a tank destroyer was launched against enemy tanks from a defensive position, such as an ambush, whereas the lower silhouette was necessary.

The turret-less product manufacturers for the installation of a bigger rifle with a longer barrel than can be mounted on the same chassis in a turreted tank, usually a devoted anti-tank gun (rather than a regular tank’s gesture of good gun that could fire both anti-tank and high explosive ammunition).

The absence of a turret enhanced the internal space of the vehicle, allowing for more ammunition storage and crew comfort. [2] The removal of the turret allowed the vehicle to carry heavier armor, which was centered in the hull. To keep the overall weight down to the limit that the chassis could carry, there were periods when there was no armored canopy (just a weather cover).

Due to the lack of a turret, tank destroyers were able to be produced far more cheaply, quickly, and simpler than the tanks on which they were based, and thus were especially popular when production resources were few.

Machine guns were mounted for use against infantry after hard lessons early in the war, but their limited rotation meant they were still less efficient than those placed on turret-mounted tanks.

Are Tank Destroyers Tanks?

Tank destroyers were highly mobile, poorly armored tank-type vehicles deployed to engage tanks during World War II. Their side and rear armor were frequently thin, and their guns were typically located in open turrets or casemates with a small traverse range.

What Is A Tank Destroyer?

Tank destroyers were highly mobile, poorly armored tank-type vehicles deployed to engage tanks during World War II. Their side and rear armor were frequently thin, and their guns were typically located in open turrets or casemates with a small traverse range.

Are Tank Destroyers Still Used?

Even the AH-64 Apache attack helicopter can only carry a maximum of 16 Hellfire anti-tank missiles, and the U.S. Army abolished its tank destroyer groups after the Cold War. Additionally, line-of-sight strikes are largely the only use of Apache helicopters.

Conclusion

Here we conclude the above-given information about What Is The Difference Between A Tank Destroyer And A Battle Tank? The Tank Destroyers were mostly killed by the Main Battle Tank doctrine. MBTs could now perform all of the functions of Tank Destroyers while being more adaptable and capable of supporting infantry.

Other issues that destroyed the Destroyer concept included the introduction of ATGMs (Anti-Tank Guided Missiles), which could do the same task while being far more reliable and less expensive.

Frequently Asked Questions

Tank destroyers are they termed tanks?

In World War II, a tank destroyer was a highly mobile, poorly armored tank-type vehicle that was used to combat tanks. The cannon was positioned in an open turret or a casemate with restricted traverse, and the tank destroyers had a rather poor side and rear armor.

Why are there no turrets on tank destroyers?

Because tank destroyers were designed to be a defensive anti-armor weapons, they lacked turrets. They were much less expensive to manufacture and could have greater armor for the same vehicle weight. Their design was intended to fight attacking armor from prepared positions.

Is it possible for a Tiger tank to defeat a contemporary tank?

Yes, the Abrams and any other contemporary tank have a significant advantage in terms of sensors, armor, and gun. But that doesn’t rule out the possibility of a tiger victory. The 88mm mod 2 is decent cannon for WWII purposes on the Tiger II. It can pierce the Abrams’ rear armor and does mobility kill on the power plant from a great distance.

Is it possible for a T 72 to destroy an Abrams?

Yes, Russia is making a lot of noise about the Armata tank family, but the Abrams have been in combat and is extremely difficult to kill. At a range of about 400 yards, the third T-72 fired a shell that left a groove in the Abrams’ armor. A shot fired through a sand barrier demolished it as well.

Leave a Comment